EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR CEREAL BARS IN WELLNESS-ORIENTED HOSPITALITY BUSINESSES

Keywords: nutritional value, recipe transparency, multicriteria approach, service logic, sanatorium and wellness nutrition, ingredient composition, consumer perception

Abstract

The use of cereal bars in the wellness-oriented segment of the hotel and restaurant business is accompanied by methodological contradictions caused by the dominance of formalized approaches to quality assessment. In HoReCa practice, the selection of such products is largely based on generalized nutritional indicators, in particular systems such as Nutri-Score, which do not account for the degree of technological processing, recipe complexity, or the level of ingredient naturalness. Under these conditions, products with formally acceptable characteristics may fail to meet the expectations of wellness-oriented consumers regarding ingredient transparency, naturalness, and service-related appropriateness for use in healthy, preventive, or restorative nutrition programs. The relevance of the study is determined by the growing demand for Healthy Snack products in wellness hotels, sanatorium-resort, and rehabilitation facilities, where food products are considered not only as sources of nutrients but also as elements of the service offering and integral components of the overall guest experience. In this context, cereal bars assume the role of markers of a facility’s wellness orientation, which requires alignment between nutritional quality, recipe naturalness, consumer perception, and conditions of service use. At the same time, an analysis of scientific sources indicates the fragmented nature of existing approaches to the evaluation of cereal bars, in which nutritional models, naturalness indices, and studies of consumer perception are considered in isolation, without taking into account the specific characteristics of the wellness and sanatorium-resort HoReCa environment. The study applies a multicriteria approach to the evaluation of cereal bars, integrating nutritional, technological, and service logics of ingredient selection. Nutritional scoring systems and naturalness indices are treated not as labeling tools but as analytical foundations for developing formulations adapted to the conditions of in-house HoReCa production. The ingredients were structured into functional groups; the roles of binding and sweetening components in shaping the nutritional profile, texture, and consumer perception of the product were analyzed; and the limitations of traditional industrial binding systems in the wellness segment were identified. The results indicate that acceptable Nutri-Score ratings do not guarantee compliance with wellness philosophy in the absence of control over recipe naturalness and service suitability. The proposed integrated approach makes it possible to harmonize nutritional quality and the level of naturalness of cereal bars without excessive complication of formulations or technological processes, while ensuring predictable product characteristics under HoReCa conditions. The practical significance of the findings lies in their potential use as a methodological basis for shaping Healthy Snack assortments in the wellness-oriented hotel and restaurant business, taking into account requirements for nutritional, consumer, and service value, as well as for further scientific research and practical implementation across various HoReCa formats.

References

Boukid F., Klerks M., Pellegrini N., Fogliano V., Sanchez-Siles L., Roman S., Vittadini E. Current and emerging trends in cereal snack bars: implications for new product development. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2022. Vol. 73, no. 5. pp. 610-629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2022.2042211

Saraiva M., Garrido M. V., Viegas C., Prada M. Nutritional Profile and Consumers’ Perceptions of Cereal Bars. Journal of Food Products Marketing. 2024. no. 30(3). pp. 89-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2024.2340446.

Peters S., Verhagen H. An Evaluation of the Nutri-Score System along the Reasoning for Scientific Substantiation of Health Claims in the EU–A Narrative Review. Foods. 2022. Vol. 11. no. 16. pp. 24-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162426

Aleksejeva S., Siksna I. Rinkule S. Composition of Cereal Bars. Journal of Health Science. 2017. Vol. 5. no. 3. pp. 139-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-7136/2017.03.004

Curtain F., Grafenauer S. Comprehensive Nutrition Review of Grain-Based Muesli Bars in Australia: An Audit of Supermarket Products. Foods. 2019. Vol. 8 no 9. pp. 370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8090370

Bower J.A., Whitten, R. Sensory characteristics and consumer liking for cereal bar snack foods. Journal of Sensory Studies, 2000. Vol. 15. no 3. pp. 327-345. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2000.tb00274.x

Klerks M., Román S., Verkerk R., Sanchez-Siles L. Are cereal bars significantly healthier and more natural than chocolate bars? A preliminary assessment in the German market. Journal of Functional Foods. 2022. Vol. 89. pp. 104940. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2022.104940

Kosicka-Gębska M., et al. Consumer Perception of Innovative Fruit and Cereal Bars – Current and Future Perspectives. Nutrients. 2024. Vol. 16. no 11. pp. 1606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111606

Sánchez-Siles L.M., Michel F., Román S., Bernal M.J., Philipsen B., Haro J.F., Bodenstab S., Siegrist M. The Food Naturalness Index (FNI): An integrative tool to measure the degree of food naturalness. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2019. Vol. 91. pp. 681-690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.015

Boukid, F., Klerks, M., Pellegrini, N., Fogliano, V., Sánchez-Siles, L., Román, S., & Vittadini, E. (2022). Current and emerging trends in cereal snack bars: Implications for new product development. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, no. 73(5), pp. 610-629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2022.2042211

Saraiva, M., Garrido, M. V., Viegas, C., & Prada, M. (2024). Nutritional Profile and Consumers’ Perceptions of Cereal Bars. Journal of Food Products Marketing, no. 30(3), pp. 89-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2024.2340446.

Peters, S., & Verhagen, H. (2022). An evaluation of the Nutri-Score system along the reasoning for scientific substantiation of health claims in the EU: A narrative review. Foods, no. 11(16), pp. 24-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162426

Aleksejeva, S., Siksna, I., & Rinkule, S. (2017). Composition of cereal bars. Journal of Health Science, no. 5. pp. 139-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-7136/2017.03.004

Curtain, F., & Grafenauer, S. (2019). Comprehensive nutrition review of grain-based muesli bars in Australia: An audit of supermarket products. Foods, no. 8(9), pp. 370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8090370

Bower, I. A., & Whitten, R. (2000). Sensory characteristics and consumer liking for cereal bar snack foods. Journal of Sensory Studies, no. 15(3), pp.327-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2000.tb00274.x

Klerks, M., Román, S., Verkerk, R., & Sánchez-Siles, L. (2022). Are cereal bars significantly healthier and more natural than chocolate bars? A preliminary assessment in the German market. Journal of Functional Foods, no. 89. pp.104940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2022.104940

Karp, S. (2024). Consumer perception of innovative fruit and cereal bars: Current and future perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, no. 21(6), pp. 694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21060694

Sánchez-Siles, L. M., Michel, F., Román, S., Bernal, M. J., Philipsen, B., Haro, J. F., Bodenstab, S., & Siegrist, M. (2019). The Food Naturalness Index (FNI): An integrative tool to measure the degree of food naturalness. Trends in Food Science & Technology, no. 91, pp. 681–690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.015

Article views: 1
PDF Downloads: 0
Published
2026-03-18
How to Cite
Moroz, S., Kalashnyk, O., & Kuznetsov, R. (2026). EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR CEREAL BARS IN WELLNESS-ORIENTED HOSPITALITY BUSINESSES. Innovations and Technologies in the Service Sphere and Food Industry, (1 (19), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-4949.1(19).2026.10