PACKAGING OF PASTEURIZED MILK AS AN ELEMENT OF ITS QUALITY ASSURANCE

Keywords: product quality, packaging material, pasteurized milk, flavor, ultraviolet light

Abstract

At the current stage of development of the food industry, the protective function of packaging for maximum preservation of product quality is less and less a priority for manufacturers. Now, the marketing component of transferring information to consumers to increase product sales comes to the fore. This is due to the fact that during the purchase process, the consumer first analyzes and evaluates the appearance of the product packaging, and only then familiarizes himself with the information provided there. Product packaging aims to convey certain information to the consumer, which can be conventionally divided into verbal (composition, nutritional value, and slogan) and visual (packaging color, transparency, design, image, material, and packaging size). No less interesting is the influence of the transparency of consumer packaging on the probability of purchasing this product. This effect is due to the direct visual perception of the product through the packaging and, accordingly, trust in it. From the products of various nomenclature presented on the shelves of commercial establishments, it is clear that marketers are already successfully using this element of "communication" with customers, using completely transparent packaging or only certain parts of it. The purpose of the article is a laboratory study of the effect of different types of lighting on pasteurized milk in different types of packaging and considering these results in the development of packaging design and methods of communication with buyers. The article discusses the theoretical basis of the influence of light rays and oxygen on the taste of pasteurized milk. The experimental part of testing the hypothesis of the effect of UV radiation on milk in different packaging is divided into two stages: in the first stage, changes in lipid peroxidation indicators and organoleptic indicators of milk stored in transparent and white PET packaging were evaluated, and in the second stage - in transparent PET packaging and puree. The conducted research gave an impetus to change the approach to product quality assessment using the example of correlation of quantitative indicators obtained by analytical methods and organoleptic evaluation of products with their further statistical processing. The use of titrometric and photometric methods to establish individual indicators of the LPO process made it possible to explain the obtained data on the evaluation of the flavor of milk. Equally important is the statistical processing of the results of the organoleptic analysis, which made it possible to quantitatively evaluate the result and form a conclusion about the difference of the product, respectively, from the consumer packaging.

References

12 Reasons to Stop Drinking Cow's Milk. [12 Reasons to Stop Drinking Cow's Milk]. Available at: https://www.peta.org/living/food/reasons-stop-drinking-milk/

Stancik, C.M. (2017). Accelerated light protection performance measurement technology validated for dairy milk packaging design. Packaging Technology & Science, vol. 30, рр. 771–780.

Suppakul, P. (2003). Active packaging technologies with an emphasison antimicrobial packaging and its applications. J. Food Sci, vol. 68, рр. 408–420.

Adam, M.A., Ali, K. (2014). Impact of visual elements of packaging of packaged milk on consumer buying behaviour. Interdiscip J. Contemp Res Bus, vol. 5, рр. 118–160.

Amerine, M.A., Roessler, E.B. (1942). Wines: Their sensory evaluation. Second Edition. [Wines: Their sensory evaluation. Second Edition]. W.H. Freeman & Co. San Francisco, CA.

Antinone, M.A., Lawless, H.T., Ledford, R.A., Johnston, M. (1994). The importance of diacetyl as a flavor component in full fat cottage cheese. Journal of Food Science, vol. 59, рр. 38–42.

Boff, J.M., Min, D.B. (2002). Chemistry and reaction of singlet oxygen in foods. Comprehensive review in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. I(I), рр. 58–72.

Brotherson, C., McMahon, D.J., Legako, J., Martini, S. (2016). Comparison of milk oxidation by exposure to LED and fluorescent light. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 99(4), рр. 2537–2544.

Chapman, K.W., Whited, L.J., Boor, K.J. (2002). Sensory threshold of light-oxidized flavor defects in milk. Journal of Food Science, vol. 67(7), рр. 2770–2773.

CLAL. Quadro dei paesi dell'Unione Europea. [CLAL. Quadro dei paesi dell'Unione Europea]. (2020). Available at: https://www.clal.it/en/?section=quadro_europa&country=IT

Cow milk alternatives, and why you should stop drinking milk. [Cow milk alternatives, and why you should stop drinking milk]. Available at: https://thehumaneleague.org/article/cow-milk.

Decker, E.A. Antioxidant mechanisms. In: Akoh C.C., Min D.B. (1998). Food lipidschemistry, nutrition, and biotechnology. New York: Marcel Dekker, рр. 397–401.

Duncan, S.E., Hannah, S. (2012). Light-protective packaging materials for foods and beverages. Ch. 15. In Yam K.L., Lee D.S. (Eds). Emerging food packaging technologies: Principles and practices, рр. 303–322.

Duncan, S.E., Webster, J.B. (2010). Oxidation and protection of milk and dairy products. In Decker E.A., Elias R.J., McClements D.J. (Eds.). Oxidation in foods and beverages and antioxidant applications. Management in different industry sectors, vol. 2, рр. 121–155.

Edwards, A.M., Silva, E. (2001). Effect of visible light on selected enzymes, vitamins and amino acids. J. Photochem Photobiol, vol. 63(1-3), рр. 126–131.

Martin, N. (2016). Exposure of fluid milk to LED light negatively affects consumer perception and alters underlying sensory properties. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 99(6), рр. 4309–4324.

Gaafar, A.M., Gaber, F.I. (1992). Volatile flavor compounds of sunlight-exposed milk. J. Dairy Sci, vol. 20(I), рр. 111–115.

Lu, C.Y. (1999). Generation and photosensitization properties of oxidized radical of riboflavin: a laser flash photolysis study. J. Photochem Photobiol B, vol. 52(1-3), рр. 111–116.

Griffiths, M.W. (2010). Improving the Safety and Quality of Milk. [Griffiths M.W. Improving the Safety and Quality of Milk]. NY: Woodhead Publishing.

Health Concerns About Dairy. Avoid the Dangers of Dairy With a Plant-Based Diet. [Health Concerns About Dairy. Avoid the Dangers of Dairy With a Plant-Based Diet]. Available at: https://www.pcrm.org/good-nutrition/nutrition-information/health-concerns-about-dairy#:~:text=Milk%20and%20other%20dairy%20products,%2C%20ovarian%2C%20and%20prostate%20cancers.

Heide, M., Olsen, S.O. (2017). Influence of packaging attributes on consumer evaluation of fresh cod. Food Qual Prefer, vol. 60, рр. 9–18.

Ofitsijnyj sajt Derzhavnoi sluzhby statystyky Ukrainy. [Official website of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. Available at: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/

Demartini, E. (2019). Impact of information and food technology neophobia in consumers' acceptance of shelf-life extension in packaged fresh fish fillets. Sustain Prod Consum, vol. 17, рр. 116–125.

Koutsimanis G. (2012). Influences of packaging attributes on consumer purchase decisions for fresh produce. Appetite, vol. 59, рр. 270–280.

Jae Hwan Lee, M.S. (2002). Photooxidation and photosensitized oxidation of linoleic acid, milk, and lard. [Photooxidation and photosensitized oxidation of linoleic acid, milk, and lard]. The Ohio State University. Available at: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=osu1486549482662984&disposition=inline

Jung, M.Y., Yoon, S.H., Lee, H.O., Min, D.B. (1998). Singlet oxygen and ascorbic acid effects on dimethyl disulfide and off-flavor in skim milk exposed to light. J. Food Sci, vol. 63(3), рр. 408–412.

Kim, Y.D., Morr, C.V. (1996). Dynamic headspace analysis of light-activated flavor in milk. Int. Dairy J, vol. 6(2), рр. 185–193.

King, J.M. (1996). Riboflavin photosensitized singlet oxygen oxidation of vitamin D (Ph. D. dissertation). Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University, Columbus, рр. 65–105.

Kontominas, M.G. (2010). Packaging and shelf life of milk. Ch 5. In Ed: Robertson G.L. Food packaging and shelf life: A practical guide, рр. 81–102.

Loose, S.M., Peschel, A., Grebitus, C. (2013). Quantifying effects of convenience and product packaging on consumer preferences and market share of seafood products: The case of oysters. Food Qual Prefer, vol. 28, рр. 492–504.

Mandler, J.M., Johnson, N.S. (1976). Some of the thousand words a picture is worth. J. Exp. Psychol, vol. 2, рр. 529–540.

Marsili, R.T. (1999). SPME-MS-MYA as an electronic nose for the study of off-flavors in milk. J. Agric Food Chem, vol. 47(2), рр. 648–654.

Meneses, M., Pasqualino, J., Castells, F. (2012). Environmental assessment of the milk life cycle: The effect of packaging selection and the variability of milk production data. J Environ Manage, vol. 107, рр. 76–83.

Mueller, S., Szolnoki, G. (2010). The relative influence of packaging, labelling, branding and sensory attributes on liking and purchase intent: Consumers differ in their responsiveness. Food Qual Prefer, vol. 21, рр. 774–783.

Johnson, D.S. (2015). Packaging modifications for protecting flavor of extended-shelf-life milk from light. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 98(4), рр. 2205–2214.

Paivio, A., Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognit Psychol, vol. 5, рр. 176–206.

Potts, H.L., Amin, K.N., Duncan, S.E. (2017). Retail lighting and packaging influence consumer acceptance of fluid milk. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 100(1), рр. 146–156.

Mestdagh, F. (2005). Protective influence of several packaging materials on light oxidation of milk. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 88(2), рр. 499–510.

Sevilla, J. (2012). When it's what's outside that matters: Recent findings on product and packaging design. ACR North Am. Adv, vol. 40, рр. 308–312.

Simmonds, G., Spence, C. (2017). Thinking inside the box: How seeing products on, or through, the packaging influences consumer perceptions and purchase behaviour. Food Qual Prefer, vol. 62, рр. 340–351.

Skibsted, L.H. (2000). Light-induced changes in dairy products. Bulletin International Dairy Federation, vol. 346, рр. 4–9.

Spaeth, E.E., Baptish, V.H., Roberts, M. (1962). Rapid Potentiolnetric Determination of Ascorbic Acid. Anal. Chem, vol. 34, рр. 1342.

Gelici‐Zeko, M.M. (2013). Studying the influence of packaging design on consumer perceptions (of dairy products) using categorizing and perceptual mapping. Packag Technol Sci, vol. 26, рр. 215–228.

Tetra Rex Plant-based wins top award for ‘Sustainable Innovation'. [Tetra Rex Plant-based wins top award for 'Sustainable Innovation']. Available at: https://www.tetrapak.com/about-tetra-pak/news-and-events/newsarchive/tetra-rex-bio-based-wins-top-award-for-sustainable-innovation.

Orquin, J.L. (2020). The visual ecology of product packaging and its effects on consumer attention. Journal of Business Research, vol. 111, рр. 187–195.

Walsh, A.M., Duncan, S.E., Potts, H.L., Gallagher, D.L. (2015). Comparing quality and emotional responses as related to acceptability of light-induced oxidation flavor in milk. Food Research International, vol. 76, рр. 293–300.

Webster, J.B., Duncan, S.E., Marcy, J.E., O'Keefe, S.F. (2009). Controlling light oxidation flavor in milk by blocking riboflavin excitation wavelengths by interference. Journal of Food Science, vol. 74, рр. 390–398.

Ziegler, E.E. (2007). Adverse effects of cow's milk in infants. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program, vol. 60, рр. 185–199.

Article views: 53
PDF Downloads: 52
Published
2023-09-20
How to Cite
Senyk, Y. (2023). PACKAGING OF PASTEURIZED MILK AS AN ELEMENT OF ITS QUALITY ASSURANCE. Innovations and Technologies in the Service Sphere and Food Industry, (3 (9), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-4949.3(9).2023.4